PSYCHOLOGISTS FOR SOCIAL CHANGE
  • Home
  • About
  • Groups
    • England >
      • North East >
        • Sheffield
        • Leeds
      • North West >
        • North East
        • A North West Just Recovery following coronavirus
        • Manchester- PSPO letter
      • Midlands >
        • Midlands
        • Leicester
      • South East >
        • East Anglia
        • Hertfordshire
        • London
        • Oxford
        • Suffolk
        • Surrey
        • Sussex
      • South West >
        • Bristol and Bath
        • South West
    • Ireland
    • Northern Ireland
    • Jersey
    • Scotland
    • Wales - Cymru >
      • Elections 2021
      • Building Resilience and Community Wellbeing
      • Social and Political Causes of Poor Mental Health
      • Responding to Austerity and Mental Health in Wales - Accessible Document
    • Start a New Group
  • Blog
  • Position statements
    • UK >
      • Response to Panorama: Undercover Hospital Abuse Scandal
      • Esther McVey: PSC and RITB response
    • Cymru / Wales >
      • Connecting the Dots Report
      • Chemical Imbalance Myth
      • Review of use of dx PD
      • UK Inhumane Removal Plans
      • WG LGBT+actionplan
      • Ty Coryton
      • Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities: The Report
      • ECT Review
      • Black Lives Matter
      • COVID 19 and Internet Access
      • Save the T4CYP Programme
      • Support the Mind over matter Report
      • UN Report on Extreme Poverty in the UK Letter
    • England >
      • Psychologists for Social Change support the moratorium on school exclusions in England
      • Racism is Not Entertainment
      • Letter to Jeremy Hunt
      • UK Government Green Paper, Transforming Children and Young People’s Mental Health Provision
      • Exam Crisis
    • Ireland >
      • End Direct Provision
    • Northern Ireland
    • Scotland
  • Campaigns
    • Structural racism demands a structural response
    • Embed anti-racism in the NHS
    • COVID-19 >
      • Mutual Aid
      • COVID and mental health
    • PSC Manifesto 2019
    • Visioning a new education system
    • New Savoy Conference Statement
    • Formulating Policy >
      • Origins of Happiness? PSC response
      • Basic Income: Psychological Impact Assessment
    • Preaching to the Non-Converted
    • Psychologists Against Austerity >
      • Austerity Briefing Paper
      • Everyday Austerity
    • Private Health Watch
  • Join our mailing list

Language to Avoid

Avoid terms like ‘poverty’ and talk about specific issues

Sometimes we use language which triggers stereotypical beliefs people hold about the causes of inequality. Because these beliefs are based upon stereotypes rather than analysis, they are likely to be simplistic and distorted.11
The power of these stereotypes appears to come from the ease with which they ‘take hold’ in public consciousness. However, when applied to real-life scenarios stereotypes often no longer make sense.12 For example, stereotypical beliefs that people receiving benefits are “lazy scroungers” no longer make sense when people are presented with information on the high proportion of recipients who are in work, in low paid jobs or working longer hours.
Interestingly, people often use multiple explanations about an issue at the same time (see box, below). One option is to provide an alternative explanation to the stereotypical
ones provided in the media or by politicians. It may
be helpful to provide explanations which clearly demonstrate the connection between poverty and specific issues such as zero-hour contracts, low pay
and the rising cost of living. For example, explaining the problem of not being able to pay all of one’s bills in terms of the cost of housing as a percentage of income rather than the individual not being thrifty enough.12
 It is important that this message is communicated as clearly and simply as possible, as our attention is more likely to be drawn to something we understand. For example, the size of a government department budget is more likely to attract someone’s attention when expressed as an amount per taxpayer rather than as the overall amount.13 


People use multiple explanations
People use different explanations of poverty in different contexts, and often give apparently contradictory
explanations at the same time.11,12 For example the same person may make sense of poverty using both individual victim-blaming alongside government-based explanations. This is important because different explanations lead to different solutions and explanations that blame the poor or fate mean that societal changes aren’t required. 



​References
 
11 Edelman, M. (1998). Language, myths and
rhetoric. Society, 35(2), 131-139.

12 Harper, D. (2003). Poverty and Discourse. In Stuart C. Carr & Tod S. Sloan (eds), Poverty and Psychology: From global perspective to local practice (pp.185 – 203). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

13 Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., & Vlaev, I. (2014). Mindspace: Influencing behaviour through public policy. London: Cabinet Office/ Institute for Government. 

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • About
  • Groups
    • England >
      • North East >
        • Sheffield
        • Leeds
      • North West >
        • North East
        • A North West Just Recovery following coronavirus
        • Manchester- PSPO letter
      • Midlands >
        • Midlands
        • Leicester
      • South East >
        • East Anglia
        • Hertfordshire
        • London
        • Oxford
        • Suffolk
        • Surrey
        • Sussex
      • South West >
        • Bristol and Bath
        • South West
    • Ireland
    • Northern Ireland
    • Jersey
    • Scotland
    • Wales - Cymru >
      • Elections 2021
      • Building Resilience and Community Wellbeing
      • Social and Political Causes of Poor Mental Health
      • Responding to Austerity and Mental Health in Wales - Accessible Document
    • Start a New Group
  • Blog
  • Position statements
    • UK >
      • Response to Panorama: Undercover Hospital Abuse Scandal
      • Esther McVey: PSC and RITB response
    • Cymru / Wales >
      • Connecting the Dots Report
      • Chemical Imbalance Myth
      • Review of use of dx PD
      • UK Inhumane Removal Plans
      • WG LGBT+actionplan
      • Ty Coryton
      • Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities: The Report
      • ECT Review
      • Black Lives Matter
      • COVID 19 and Internet Access
      • Save the T4CYP Programme
      • Support the Mind over matter Report
      • UN Report on Extreme Poverty in the UK Letter
    • England >
      • Psychologists for Social Change support the moratorium on school exclusions in England
      • Racism is Not Entertainment
      • Letter to Jeremy Hunt
      • UK Government Green Paper, Transforming Children and Young People’s Mental Health Provision
      • Exam Crisis
    • Ireland >
      • End Direct Provision
    • Northern Ireland
    • Scotland
  • Campaigns
    • Structural racism demands a structural response
    • Embed anti-racism in the NHS
    • COVID-19 >
      • Mutual Aid
      • COVID and mental health
    • PSC Manifesto 2019
    • Visioning a new education system
    • New Savoy Conference Statement
    • Formulating Policy >
      • Origins of Happiness? PSC response
      • Basic Income: Psychological Impact Assessment
    • Preaching to the Non-Converted
    • Psychologists Against Austerity >
      • Austerity Briefing Paper
      • Everyday Austerity
    • Private Health Watch
  • Join our mailing list